Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id TAA01994 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 19:03:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQaack19463; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 18:40:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA11479; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 18:40:35 -0500
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 18:40:35 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <731.6598T1134T2920@monmouth.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: rcohen@monmouth.com (Robert Cohen)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Snow Storms via Sparks??
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>I'm workign on a school project for a teacher at teh
>university. We need to make a violent snow storm which almost
>obscures the background..eventually the storm subsides to reveal
>the background...Can sparks accomplish this type of effect?
>We're looking for lots of swirling paterns to suggest the
>turbulence of teh storm..I was thinking of using mass amounts of
>particles via lightwave..but perhaps sparks can do it quicker
>and more easily?
Sparks CAN do this, but at the cost of a great ram expenditure...
